Jeremy Morton wrote:
OK, so I just got one of those www medsXX com spams, and even though it hit my rule and got 2.0 added to it, it still didn't even get over 3 points. Looks like it was sent from quite a legit host. What rules do other people get matching for this e-mail?

http://pastebin.com/m3b9629b6

Content analysis details:   (7.8 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
                            [190.244.172.161 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
 0.1 BOTNET_BADDNS          Relay doesn't have full circle DNS

[botnet_baddns,ip=190.244.172.161,rdns=161-172-244-190.fibertel.com.ar]
 1.5 BOTNET                 Relay might be a spambot or virusbot
[botnet0.8,ip=190.244.172.161,rdns=161-172-244-190.fibertel.com.ar,baddns,client,ipinhostname]
 0.1 BOTNET_IPINHOSTNAME    Hostname contains its own IP address

[botnet_ipinhosntame,ip=190.244.172.161,rdns=161-172-244-190.fibertel.com.ar]
 0.1 BOTNET_CLIENT          Relay has a client-like hostname
[botnet_client,ip=190.244.172.161,rdns=161-172-244-190.fibertel.com.ar,ipinhostname]
 0.5 CTYME_IXHASH           BODY: BiXhash found @ ctyme.ixhash.ne
 0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.5555]
 0.5 GENERIC_IXHASH         BODY: iXhash found @ generic.ixhash.net
 0.5 NIXSPAM_IXHASH         BODY: iXhash found @ ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
 0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS



--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, UCL Medical School
WWW:    http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
Study Health Informatics - Modular Postgraduate Degree
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/study-health-informatics/

Reply via email to