On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, John Rudd wrote:
As I've said, I don't really have a plan to incorporate the patch into the main dist.
You probably should. It doesn't prevent you from pursuing your design changes, and it would fix the problem for those who are experiencing the problem today.
Is it truly *that* onerous to produce a 0.9 tarball that includes the patch, either as a standalone file or applied to the sources?
As a plus, that would create a dist file with a newer date to reassure people that it's still an active development project.
-- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- It's easy to be noble with other people's money. -- John McKay, _The Welfare State: No Mercy for the Middle Class_ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 52 days since 9th Circuit incorporated 2nd Amdt - MSM still silent
