On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:41:48PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Just to verify, try adding something like this to your procmailrc, right
> > > before the recipe that filters through spamc. Then check the log. (Note,
> > > linebreak intended.)
> > >
> > > LOG = "Hello, I am ${LOGNAME}.
> > > "
> >
> > Procmail is running as "steeve",
> >
> > Hello, I am steeve.
>
> Weird. :) Honestly, I quickly pulled LOGNAME out of the man page. I'm
> not entirely sure this really reflects the UID. I guess I'd alter that
> debugging log line, to dump some other information, to track this down.
>
> BTW, is this a site-wide procmailrc or a user one? Did you DROPPRIVS
> before that, in case of site-wide?
It's my user .procmailrc.
>
> > >From medicalhairrestoration...@hairproonline.com Thu Jun 4 14:05:08 2009
> > Subject: [SPAM 4.6] RE: Hair news : Free DVD
> > Folder: /var/mail/steeve
> > 341674
> >
> > It woudl have been incredbily perplexing if procmail were running
> > as an openpkg user since it's not an openpkg package.
>
> But spamc is. Not that that really should matter, but there's a link.
> Any chance it's a setuid executable?
That's it, mystery solved :)
[ste...@oneguycoding .procmail]$ ls -l /openpkg/bin/spamc
-rwsr-xr-x 1 openpkg-r openpkg 393128 Apr 23 12:27 /openpkg/bin/spamc
Thanks for your help, I was pulling my hair out for a while
on this one.
Cheers,
steeve
--
Steeve McCauley ste...@oneguycoding.com
:wq http://oneguycoding.com
What this country needs is a good five cent microcomputer.
