Linda Walsh wrote: > To be clear about what is being white listed, would it > hurt if the 'brief report for the AWL', instead of : > -1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > > it had > -1.3 AWL AWL: 'From: 518501.com' addr is in auto white-list > > So I can see what domain it is flagging with a 'white' value? > > I don't know of any emails from '518501.com' that wouldn't have > been classified spam, so none should have a 'negative value'. > > What was the final message score in this example? Looking at the AWL score alone is meaningless, and doesn't show what the AWL thinks the historical average is.
If the final score was over 6.3, the AWL still "thought" the sender was a spammer. It's just splitting the averages.
