Quoting LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com>:

Scores 1.0 for me

<http://home.kreme.com/spam20090521.txt>

X-Spam-Report:
        *  0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server
        *      [93.86.56.82 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
        * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
        * -3.3 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM 
white-list
        * -1.3 DKIM_VERIFIED Domain Keys Identified Mail: signature passes
        *      verification
        * -1.0 DKIM_SIGNED Domain Keys Identified Mail: message has a signature
        *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
        *  0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
        *      [score: 0.4986]
        *  0.7 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different
        *  2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
        *  2.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 0-400 bytes of words
        *  1.7 SARE_HTML_IMG_ONLY FULL: Short HTML msg, IMG and A HREF, maybe
        *      naught else
        *  0.0 HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1 HTML is very short with a linked image
        * -0.7 ENV_AND_HDR_DKIM_MATCH Env and Hdr From used in default DKIM WL
        *      Match

total of -6.3 if ham scores, sigh.

Gotten multiples of this spam on multiple accounts, include one that ONLY gets spam.

Stock SA v3.2.5, no additional rules:

X-Spam-Status: Reqd:5.0 Hits:7.7 Learn:disabled Tests:HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=1.462,
        HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1=1.078,MPART_ALT_DIFF=1.143,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.117,SPF_PASS=-0.001,TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.899




Reply via email to