On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 17:32 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> However, the domain <incometitanic . com> should be listet worldwide in
> any RBLs or whatever
It *is* listed in URIBL_BLACK. See your own results. Also listed in
SURBL JP as of the time of this writing.
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,
> URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.2.3
You got a problem with your Bayes. Train it.
> Received: from mx1.incometitanic.com ([::ffff:66.xx.xxx.188]) by
Hmm, this might be a problem. SA doesn't fully support IPv6 yet. Dunno
if this would cause less BL lookups. That IP isn't listed widely anyway,
though e.g. Barracuda BRBL and the NiX Spam DNSBL do list it.
Out of curiosity: Why did you mask the offenders IP?
Please do NOT send spam samples to the list. Upload it somewhere,
possibly using a pastebin.
Sending links to blacklisted URIs to the list isn't the smartest
decision. Yes, the ASF list-servers do run SA. Unlike the original
message, your post scored a 6.0 (conservative 10.0 required).
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
