On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 17:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
>
> > 2) and i reject all emails with png image files (body containing:
> > Content-Type: image/png;)
>
> That's a little harsh by itself.
Agreed, definitely. Makes one wonder if he knows what png is, and who
uses it.
> > conclusion:- i think emails with only a PNG are 99.999% spam
*Only* is the key here, that means no text parts.
> We agree, and we've posted some rules that check for that.
Come on, John, that was you. :) Nice rule indeed. Not that any of these
would have slipped through here, but I really enjoy the additional 2
points punishment.
> It's a good idea to catch up with the archives before responding to a post
> that's more than two weeks old.
Hey, go easy on him! ;) That's a Nabble user. And he even tried to be
helpful. Now, what's the proper term for archive in "forum" context
rather than mailing lists...?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
