On Sonntag 17 Mai 2009 Yet Another Ninja wrote: > The future of this project depends if the concept is of any use. The > lack of feedback, any kind, must mean its of little value so it might > as well be drowned at birth.
I generally like the idea. But this project is in the beginners phase, and a whole lot of people will want to wait until others report it's benefits. After all, who wishes to put it in production and then maybe it causes a lot of FPs? ATM, you use a very conservative e-mail block list feed, meaning no FPs should occur. But as there is currently no exact description of where e- mail reports will come from, nobody knows how good the list will be then. That said, I'll implement and test it, and hopefully it's good, with no FPs. I immeditately see that GMX is currently not listed in EMAILBL. It's a big player in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland). They have a hard anti spam setup (e.g. not accepting mails from hosts without reverse IP DNS entries, aka PTR Records), so maybe it's not worth to list them? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
