On Fri, 15 May 2009, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 10:25 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
As I said, doing that is only _implied_ in the docs.
Site-specific configuration data is used to override any values which
had already been set.
John, so that merely *implies* but doesn't specifically state that
configuration values can be overwritten? Maybe my understanding of
English isn't as good as I thought after all... ;)
No, I'd initially looked at Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf, not the man page,
and my "implies" comment was directed at that - which means my saying "in
the docs" was wrong. Sorry for the confusion, I should have been specific.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is when people look at Yahoo, slashdot, or groklaw and
jump from obvious and correct observations like "Oh my God, this
place is teeming with utter morons" to incorrect conclusions like
"there's nothing of value here". -- Al Petrofsky, in Y! SCOX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until the 5th anniversary of SpaceshipOne winning the X-prize
