>> x-spam-status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=DCC_CHECK,RCVD_IN_FIVETENSG, > ^^^^^^^^^ > Hits on 50% of your HAM, doesn't it?
Yea, it hits a lot but not enough to cause false positives. I score it 1.0 but also use it with some meta rules to filter out some specific stuff that was sneaking by. It appears that I should get Razor going and at least take a look at the KHOP_* rules and JunkEmailFilter BL. Thanks everyone for taking the time to check the messages through your filters. -Tony B -----Original Message----- From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:38 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Low Score? On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 18:54 -0400, Tony Bunce wrote: > Here are the scores and hits I am getting: > > x-spam-status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=DCC_CHECK,RCVD_IN_FIVETENSG, ^^^^^^^^^ Hits on 50% of your HAM, doesn't it? http://stats.dnsbl.com/fiveten.html http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/10/fiveten-blacklist-not-accurate.html > Not sure why everyone else sees MISSING_DATE, MISSING_SUBJECT, etc. Bad copy-n-paste for their checking. From what I recall from my quick look earlier, your pastebins are OK. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
