On 5-May-2009, at 19:08, Ned Slider wrote:
Content-Type: image/png
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
Interesting. I'd think a no-name image would be a pretty strong spam
indicator.
Didn't it hit the no text rules?
I get:
Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 3.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to
95%
[score: 0.8936]
2.2 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/
)
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host
with no rDNS
on my list account.
--
Eyes the shady night has shut/Cannot see the record cut And silence
sounds no worse than cheers/After earth has stopped the ears.
