Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I just upgraded to 3.2.5 ran sa-update and I got this message with only one
rule tripped
I'm putting a link to the message as well as the headers
If anyone can shed some light here , I would appreciate it.
ftp://ftp.fcimail.org/IT/SA/headers.txt
ftp://ftp.fcimail.org/IT/SA/Would%20you%20imagine%20your%20life%20having%20no
%20pain%20and%20dysfunctions.htm
TIA
J
Same here other than a few hits against DNSBLs.
X-Spam-Report:
* 3.0 RCVD_IN_SBLXBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-XBL
* [85.75.94.188 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
* 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
* [score: 0.5014]
* 3.0 RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 RBL: Received via a relay in
* dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
* [85.75.94.188 listed in dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net]
* 2.0 RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 RBL: Received via a relay in
* dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
* [85.75.94.188 listed in dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net]
* 0.0 RCVD_IN_UCE_COMBINED Received via a relay in UCEProtect
* 1.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no
rDNS
Obviously my scoring is a little higher than yours and I catch it but
there's not a lot to go on.
Spamhaus catches it in 2 of it's lists (PBL and XBL). I would really
recommend implementing zen.spmauaus.org at the MTA (smtp) level as this
will block much of this junk before it ever gets near SA.
