On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 06:42 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 6:04:50 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:

> > I have seen quite a few myself. Unfortunately, they tend to slip by.
> > Made a first attempt at catching them, which helped -- though I do see
> > new variants going under the radar of a few of my meta's.
> 
> > I'd be interested in getting more samples (contact me off-list first!)
> > by anyone, to tighten and broaden (yes, both) my local rules and drop
> > them publicly.

> They're probably catchable by body text and/or header patterns.
> Could make a good new rule as suggested in the "Code Rot" thread.

Exactly -- that's why I asked for more samples. :)

  guenther

-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to