Charles Gregory wrote:
> I've been scoring the attachment name pattern with a 'full' test.
> But this will only work until they figure ways to randomize the 
> attachment names....

The mimeheader plugin can do that and is much cheaper.

The
    <STYLE>
    Abody
    Ahead
    </STYLE>
part of the HTML seems to be a good spam sign, too. I can’t come up with
a test (other than a full test) that will actually match all of that
with 3.2.x: the rawbody rule matches one line at a time. A meta on both
Abody and Ahead in the rawbody seems to do a pretty good job.

To what extent should Windows Mail be counted as a variant of
Outlook/Outlook Express? It’s not caught in __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA: should it
be?

Hope this helps,

James.

-- 
E-mail:     james@ | ... a sign carefully conveying in pictograms the fact
aprilcottage.co.uk | that you should not leave wheelchairs on a certain river
                   | bank as they would roll down the hill and the crocs would
                   | eat the passenger.                                -- Skud

Reply via email to