Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> By looking at the sub-rules' names I got the impression they are just
> random. But maybe they actually are somehow based on the rule's content?
> Never checked. Justin?
Justin Mason replied:
> yep, they're derived from a hash of the string.
Is that documented, or could it be documented somewhere?
I haven’t had to touch it recently, but I do have a small .cf of false
positives:
meta __SEEK_LZH2GT 0 # Microsoft Office 2003 Pro
meta __SEEK_O1TQTY 0 # aving trouble viewing this e
meta __SEEK_QGCXIK 0 # lots of dots
which relies on the names being derived from the string.
Thanks,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Humans are humans. No one grouping is all good or all
aprilcottage.co.uk | bad, no one group has a monopoly on honour, decency or
| truth. Anyone that claims to have one is a
| dishonourable, indecent liar. -- Phil Launchbury
