alexus wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:03 PM, alexus <ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > an example
> > 
> > Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 97779, pid: 97780, t: 3.8809s
> >        scanners: regex: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95/m:50/d:9252 spam: 3.2.5
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
> > mx1.alexus.biz X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.9
> > required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE, 
> >        MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
> > 
> > it gave BAYES_99, yet it still think it's autolearn=no, and it still
> > doesnt think this is SPAM
> 
> this is from another email
> 
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
> mx1.alexus.biz X-Spam-Level: *****
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.6 required=5.0
>       tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
> MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5
> X-Spam-Report: 
>       *  3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
>       *      [score: 1.0000]
>       * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
>       *  0.6 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
>       *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
>       *  1.5 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
> 
> how can I put X-Spam-Report into every email? because this was
> generated manually via "spamassassin -t email"

Put this in either your local.cf or a user's user_prefs file:

add_header all Report _REPORT_

"autolearn=no" has nothing to do with the Bayes score.  In fact, the
Bayes score and a few other rules are intentionally excluded when
determining whether to autolearn an email.  In both of these cases,
there were not enough rule hits to trigger the autolearning process.

-- 
Bowie

Reply via email to