On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:43 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > From: Karsten Bräckelmann
> > Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more > > extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test? > > As you already pointed out, they are not exactly the same. More precisely: If that rule-set still would be generated, it would be a sub-set of bl.spamcop.net. > The fact is that 70_sc_top200 seems stuck at Jan 2008 and the sare's index > page (http://www.rulesemporium.com/) says ninjas are busy working on > something else. > > It seems to me 70_sc_top200 is an automatic rule, which tautologically > shouldn't involve any ninja at all in its updating. Well, it still would require some maintenance occasionally. > Anybody knows what happened to it? It died. And in fact, died *years* ago. As you can see two clicks away from the link you posted, it became superfluous long ago and has been deprecated. Just see the description of the rule-set: Do not use these if you use SpamCop.net's blacklist (Default with net enabled on 2.63). This ruleset is created from that data. [...] So, I'd say delete your copy of that stale file immediately. guenther -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
