> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
> Inviato: sabato 11 aprile 2009 1.28
> 
> On 10-Apr-2009, at 04:52, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2777168254z0fdfee4493414fc9bde77b85d4d93f
> 01z;action=display
> 
> 
> No segfault here:
> 
> Content analysis details:   (7.4 points, 5.0 required)
> 
>   pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
>   0.0 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
>   0.0 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
> -0.0 NO_RELAYS              Informational: message was not relayed via
> SMTP
>   2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP         Missing blank line between message header
> and body
>   1.6 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
>   2.0 LARGETABLE             RAW: Large HTML Table
>   1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
> -0.0 NO_RECEIVED            Informational: message has no Received
> headers
>   0.0 NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE     Message appears to be missing most
> RFC-822 headers
> 
> I believe the MISSING_HB_SEP and MISSING_HEADERS are because of
> Spamcop's obfuscation of the message.

I see also NO_RELAYS and MISSING_SUBJECT. I think there was a problem in the
cut-and-past you did in order to fetch the message.

Anyway, your run is interesting: the message fires LARGETABLE.

Thanks,

Giampaolo
 

Reply via email to