I will check on all of these things, however, I have to read some docs on the subject.
I was just getting into this type of configuration when I got swamped with some other projects. I will have to research bayes configurations. I am reinstalling spamassassin to include some of the optional perl modules that were omitted originally, however, since bayes does not seem to be working, I guess I will have to check there first. There was a mention of evolution's junk plugin, however, I had to disable that plugin and just rely on the server, since it would just cause an infinite loop, whenever new mail was looked at, causing Evloution to lock up. I use spamd on my mail server, and the server pipes it straight to my spamd session, and then if it gets out, then I get email. That may be the reason for the non-sa headers. I just looked at a few other "good" email examples in my inbox, and non of them has SA headers, except for the ones from this list. On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 14:20 -0400, John Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, martes wrote: > > > Apr 10 10:00:07 dataserver1 spamd[94633]: spamd: result: . 2 - > > MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RCVD_IN_PBL,XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4BF4C > > scantime=0.8,size=1219,user=(unknown),uid=1004,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=51745,mid=<01c9ba27$b4686080$f6c93...@jwq>,autolearn=no > > It looks like Bayes isn't working. Have you disabled Bayes? Have you given > Bayes any training yet? > > > Here is a link to the listed message that passed through the filter. > > > > http://pastebin.com/d6fe63bd6 > > The headers in that spample don't say anything about SA at all. Did you > export the message from your mail client? That can omit headers. > > Is it possible for you to directly retrieve the message out of your system > mailbox file using a text editor? That's guaranteed to not omit anything > of interest. >
