On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, alexus wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
How fast are non-SA DNS queries on that box? If they take ten seconds to
return an answer, SA is not the culprit.
On 01.04.09 17:53, alexus wrote:
without dns they are 0.1 - 1.5s, with DNS they are ~7s
by "non-SA DNS" he did not mean SA without DNS, but DNS without SA... just
FYI.
what I meant is SA without this:
v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
Are your scan times still bouncing around? Or did you turn DNS off again?
(The story so far: offlist we verified a local DNS cache was being used
and SA was brought up-to-date - dsbl was still being queried, sa-update
fixed that. Now the scan times are inconsistent - some short
~1sec, some long ~6sec.)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can't reason a person out of a position if he didn't use
reason to get there in the first place. -- Kristopher, at Marko's
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until Thomas Jefferson's 266th Birthday
