On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas >> <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas >> >> <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: >> >> >> > How fast are non-SA DNS queries on that box? If they take ten >> >> >> > seconds to >> >> >> > return an answer, SA is not the culprit. >> >> > >> >> > On 01.04.09 17:53, alexus wrote: >> >> >> without dns they are 0.1 - 1.5s, with DNS they are ~7s >> >> > >> >> > by "non-SA DNS" he did not mean SA without DNS, but DNS without SA... >> >> > just >> >> > FYI. >> > >> > On 08.04.09 10:21, alexus wrote: >> >> what I meant is SA without this: >> >> >> >> v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval >> > >> > what HE (Josh Hardin) meant, is: >> > >> > dig www.microsoft.com. >> > dig 66.36.168.195.zen.spamhaus.org >> > dig mx surbl.org >> > >> > and look at the "Query time" result. > > On 08.04.09 11:40, alexus wrote: >> r...@mx1 ~ 503$ time dig www.microsoft.com. >> ;; Query time: 0 msec > >> r...@mx1 ~ 504$ time dig 66.36.168.195.zen.spamhaus.org >> ;; Query time: 288 msec > >> r...@mx1 ~ 505$ time dig mx surbl.org >> ;; Query time: 80 msec > > seems good. But I think that your problem has been solved or am I wrong? > At least you have learned what means "dns without spamassassin" :-)--
yeah, my spam assassin seems to be acting up all right.... go figure ;-) > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity... > -- http://alexus.org/
