On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 18:15 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> I ran spamc a couple of times. It sometimes gives different scores for same
> email. Sometimes it gives higher than 5,sometime lower. What can be wrong?
Can't tell, unless you provide the SA headers for the first and last
run. However, my guess is there's nothing wrong.
AWL will have learned from the past runs, thus it is quite likely to
change. Bayes might have been trained automatically, so it might change,
too. Then there are network tests, with RBLs catching up, so a late(r)
re-run might show more RBL tests hitting, than the first run.
Other than that -- see the first paragraph...
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
