Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> Is there a document regarding the interpretation of
>
>
> > sa-learn --dump magic
> config: could not find site rules directory
>
> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db
> version
> 0.000 0 261451 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000 0 18530 0 non-token data: nham
> 0.000 0 143599 0 non-token data: ntokens
>
> 0.000 0 1231533845 0 non-token data: oldest atime
> 0.000 0 1237223892 0 non-token data: newest atime
> 0.000 0 1237214668 0 non-token data: last
> journal sync atime
> 0.000 0 1237059740 0 non-token data: last
> expiry atime
>
> 0.000 0 5529600 0 non-token data: last
> expire atime delta
>
> 0.000 0 9311 0 non-token data: last
> expire reduction count
>
>
> Let me take a stab at it.
> The db version is 3
>
> You have 261,451 tokens that appeared in ‘spam’.
> You have 18,530 tokens that appeard in ‘ham’
Actually, nspam and nham count messages, not tokens. They're also a
count of the total training, and don't "go down" as tokens expire out.
>
> You have 143,599 tokens (remember, some tokens could appear in both
> spam and ham)
Yes, and also you need to account for SA expiring out tokens, and tokens
that occur in multiple messages. (ie: it's not strange that your message
count is higher than your token count).
>
> The oldest token is date -j -f %s 1231533845
> Fri Jan 9 15:44:05 EST 2009
>
> The newest token is date -j -f %s 1237223892
> Mon Mar 16 13:18:12 EDT 2009
>
> The rest should be easy to figure out.
>
> --
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> >|SECNAP Network Security
> Finalist 2009 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
> FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®.
> For Information please see www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
> <http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
