LuKreme wrote:
You're right if you're saying that the method would work better if there were more ham rules. From what I have seen in my experiments however, the results are also very precise with the current SA ruleset. But any rule that adds some information to the feature set might yet increase the performance (especially the performance on unrecognized spam, on ham/spam which is detected by SA as well, the algorithm performs nearly as good as SA itself).This is an excellent idea, but it also needs rule hits on ham, right?
Regards, Chris
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
