Marc Perkel wrote:
At the moment, I am only using the SVM answer. What you finally do with it, is the next step. You can use it like a normal rule and give it a score, of course. You can also only use the SVM, but I think I'll go for the scoring idea :) It would also be possible to use an SVM model that supports confidence/probabilities. At the moment I was only evaluating the precision/recall for this method only without any scorings.I suppose what I was thinking was that you still used the SA result but added or subtracted from the SA result based on your SVM code, sort of the way bayes does. Or are you letting SVM make the final determination?
Chris
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
