> -----Original Message----- > From: Neil Schwartzman [mailto:neil.schwartz...@returnpath.net] > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 12:22 AM > To: Spamassassin > Subject: Re: ReturnPath, Habeas, BondedSender > > > > Good first step, now how about an RFC complaint abuse@ address? > > So you can complain about any errant returnpath.net emails? That has > always been in place. It would be inappropriate to complain about certified > client emails to our role accounts, ergo the specific addresses for such > purposes. > --
I think it's inappropriate to ask someone who received spam accredited by these organizations to also help sort their abuse mail by having to track down some non-standard address. If the abuse@ address is too busy, then the accreditation process needs more work. That being said, maybe the rule description should include the reporting addresses. Why would I look on the SA wiki for a place to report ReturnPath, Habeas, and BondedSender complaints? Jason A. Bertoch Network Administrator ja...@electronet.net Electronet Broadband Communications 3411 Capital Medical Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32308 (V) 850.222.0229 (F) 850.222.8771
