Subscribing to a mailing-list decreases response time drastically. No moderation. But I guess you should know that... ;)
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 11:56 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > since 2009-02-25 I become bombed by arround 430.000 spams like the one > below and I had to decrease my spamscore, since I was not able to > disable this crappy test of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW which persists. > > Can someone tell me where I find it and how to disable? Uhm, something like this? (adjust to your SA 3.2.3) $ cd /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/ $ grep -l RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW * Disabling this rule is about a 'score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW 0' in your local.cf or user_prefs away. But I figured someone who used to post here should know that... > Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 4.5 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% > [score: 1.0000] > 2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO > -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low > trust > [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] Increasing the scores for BAYES_9x would have helped, too. :) Other than that, I agree with Rafael. Please report to dnswl.org. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
