On 25.02.09 10:03, Paul Houselander (SME) wrote:
> I use the SARE rules and have been asked to explain why a certain email got
> caught as spam.
IMPORTANT: Due to Ninjas being busy with lives, wives & hockey matches, SARE
rules aren't being updated.
> I'm having trouble with this rule
>
> SARE_RECV_IP_218078
>
> 70_sare_header1.cf:header SARE_RECV_IP_218078 Received =~
> /\[218\.(?:7[89]|8[0123])\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\]/
>
> 70_sare_header1.cf:describe SARE_RECV_IP_218078 Passed through
> possible spammer relay or source
>
> I can see why its hit as the relay was 218.78.208.145 - however does anyone
> know what's wrong with this address? I couldn't find any info as to why mail
> from 218.7.. is considered dodgy (except it's from china)?
apparently yes. if the score 1.6 makes a problem, better get rid of SARE
rules...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!".
