Karsten Bräckelmann schreef:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 12:55 +0100, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
Hmm, I thought you could specify several channels with sa-update.
This is my current update line:
sa-update --allowplugins --gpgkey xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --channel
saupdates.openprotect.com --channel updates.spamassasin.org
and now that I paste it ... I see it ... spamassassin should be with
double S. BTW do I need that gpgkey line there? It seems to check for
updates just fine without it (I did run sa-update --import <keyfile>)?
But It states there's no updates on spamassassin channel. Which makes a
little sense, as it's a fresh install not all rules should be needing
updating (in theory).
I guess that's because you ran sa-update correctly at least once since
your OP and this "no updates" response. Your attached debug output
supports this. The missing stuff clearly is there now.
Indeed, but using spamassassin -D or -t <sample-spam.txt still resulted
in a lot of zero scores which made me wonder is all.
[8027] dbg: config: using "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005" for sys rules pre
files
[8027] dbg: config: read file
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/saupdates_openprotect_com.pre
[8027] dbg: config: using "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005" for default rules dir
[8027] dbg: config: read file
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/saupdates_openprotect_com.cf
[8027] dbg: config: read file
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
Anyway I did the same check using the
sample-spam.txt and yes, I see more rules being used (from the updated
rules obviously) but it's still not checking the default rules in
/usr/share/spamassasin/. Whether that needs to be a problem, I don't
Yup, SA won't use that dir, if the one above (created by sa-update)
exists. This is exactly your original problem -- SA using the updates
dir, cause it exists and was populated with the SARE rules, but no stock
rules.
Ah, see, I didn't get that from the documentation. That sa would ignore
default paths once it found 'updated' rules.
know. I can only think of rules now not being used if they haven't been
updated yet. Also the updates SA rules are being done after the SARE
ones? I'd figure 70 be higher then 10 - 60 .. I hope it won't matter.
sa-update updates all rules -- in fact, it pretty much pulls the entire
stock rules, containing the latest (stable) changes pushed to the update
channel. It is not a diff.
The order of specifying the channels or running the updates (once the
stock rules *are* updated, mind you) is irrelevant. That's no problem.
I attached the output this time as it's quite a lot to go through. But
again the 'score' of 0 on everything:
Talking about your incoming mail? Are you using spamd? Did you restart
it after running sa-update?
In order to pick up the updated rules (if any), spamd needs to be
restarted whenever updates have been retrieved. You can find more about
this and how to automatically restart spamd only if there are updates
documented in the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
running spamassassin -Dt < sample-spam.txt I mean. That's where I
received those zero score messages from (normally I run spamassassin via
amavisd and got 100 upppon 100 of Spam each day. Now that I properly
update I get 4 or 5 per day.
It only gets 1000 points for the GTUBE rule; so atleast that's working ...
Huh? No, it triggers more than that. :) Seems to work just fine, now.
Only half the rules give scores to it though, a lot still remain at 0.
But since it appears to be working nicely now, I think all is well.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1002.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,GTUBE,
NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,PYZOR_CHECK autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Thanks for your help and time.
Oliver
