> > On 21.02.09 12:18, mouss wrote: > >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit : > >>> On 20.02.09 19:26, Matt Kettler wrote: > >>>> Since you're bouncing any off-list emails because you reject my entire > >>>> ISP, I'm going to drop out of aiding on this matter. > >>> I'm not rejecting "your ISP". I'm rejecting mail from addresses I could > >>> not > >>> complain back to. > >>> > >>>> Fix your own domain's over-zealous behaviors first. > >>> Fix your domain's RFC conformity first > >> so you're complaining about a high score for an invalid helo coupled > >> with extremely weired 3-domains in a hop mail and at the same time > >> rejecting mail from a large ISP because of rfci listing? > >> > >> if you're fighting for rfc compliance, reject both, and the issue is > >> closed ;-p
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit : > > rejecting because HELO does not match violates RFC. case open. On 21.02.09 12:32, mouss wrote: > I said "invalid". a "bare" IP is invalid in helo, and has been since 822. good point, another thing to check for. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I intend to live forever - so far so good.
