On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 10:42 -0800, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> >> > Do you use any MTA-level DNSBLs?
> >>
> >> No.
> >
> > If you have ample of ressources you can do this. If you are getting
> > tenthousands of mails you can't (or won't). We reject about 90% of the
> > spam at MTA. That's mostly Bot spam. Why should we burn good ressources
> > for that stuff? Interestingly, that also kills almost all of the "fierce"
> > spam that might slip thru SA. So, SA then does a very good job on the rest
> > which lets slip only a few by. With SA only we would have much more slip
> > by. And we don't need any extra rules (like SARE, KAM) anymore. I'm using
> > sought, but it doesn't appear to be too efective.
>
> Which SA plugin performs this? Is it Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL?
^^^^
Err, what exactly do you mean by "this"? Sought?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
