On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:17 -0800, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: > score URIBL_BLACK 0 2.5 0 2.0 # n=0 n=2 > score BAYES_99 0 0 4.0 4.0 > > However, I'm getting messages that hit both URIBL_BLACK and BAYES_99 > and have a score of 6.0. How can that be (I would expect 6.5)?
The score of 6 is correct. Both, network tests and Bayes are enabled, as you clearly can verify given the rules triggered. ;) > X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.0 required=7.5 tests=BAYES_99,URIBL_BLACK > shortcircuit=no autolearn=no version=3.2.4 See section Scoring Options in the docs: http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html If four valid scores are listed, then the score that is used depends on how SpamAssassin is being used. [...] The fourth score is used when Bayes is enabled and network tests are enabled (score set 3). -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
