Just got this in an actual replica watch spam.
This spam was sent using an innocent third party as the fake sender address
who will pick up bounces and misdirected spam complaints. It went out via a
third party host (broadband host in the USA), i.e. stealing someone else's
service. It was sent to addresses harvested off websites at random to people
who have no interest whatsoever in fake watches, stealing their time.
Whoever is sending this spam has no regard for other people whatsoever.
It was good for a laugh, really. :) Until a strange feeling crept over
me, realizing the words...
Confirmed. That paragraph *severely* affected Bayes for me. No Bayes
training with that mail up to that point, results reproducible.
BAYES_99 probability 1.0000 WITHOUT that text
BAYES_50 probability 0.5905 with that poisonous snippet
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
