> Ralf Heidenreich wrote: > > sa-learn coaches spamassassin. On 23.01.09 10:45, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Actually, sa-learn coaches the Bayes db if you want to be specific.
I prefer word "train" instead of "coach" :-) > > Is it better, to coach spamassassin with mails, that are not examined > > through spamassassin. Also original spam-mails. > > If spamassassin examines mails, and writes a Spam-Status flag into the > > header, can these mails used for sa-learn? > > It doesn't matter. Train with everything you have. sa-learn will > automatically remove any SA headers. It will also automatically skip > any messages that have been previously learned, so you don't have to > worry about learning the same email twice. However, most important is training on false-positives and false-negatives, then on mail that hadn't been classified with high or low spam probablility, especially mail that had too high (ham) or low (spam) score. Yes, even training on BAYES_00 and BAYES_99 can give some advantages, but if you don't have much time, fucos on those I described above -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.
