RobertH wrote on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:54:41 -0800:

> would those of you in the know please comment based upon your data re: the
> below rules and their effectiveness in hitting spam vrs ham and/or false
> readings in diverse or fairly diverse large scale isp and/or corporate
> installations please

fairly easy. run one week with default settings and one week with 
"skip_rbl_checks 1". Then compare.
In general, these rules will provide hits if you don't use RBLs at MTA 
level. If you use RBLs to reject at MTA level they won't hit much.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



Reply via email to