On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:29 +0000, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:48:55PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:

> > I explained it slightly more detailed in Bug 6008.
> >   https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6008
> 
> Ahhh.. I see (er I think...)
> 
> Tell me; when you reported that bugzilla was hitting ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE did it
> hit ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE? ;) ...er... OK I'll shut up now...

No. I didn't even notice that myself, but have been asked about it.
That's because I do *not* scan bugzilla mail for spam, but filter it out
early.

There's absolutely no reason to torture my SA with the bulk of bugzilla
or mailing-list mail. Yes, I do a *lot* of both. They get delivered
without being scanned by SA. And I highly recommend doing this.

However, yes, of course, it *would* have hit ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE... ;)

  guenther

-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to