On 19-Jan-2009, at 23:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
LuKreme wrote on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:03:18 -0700:
<http://home.kreme.com/ephspam.txt>
Gotten a few like this in the last day or two. I have no idea why
they are hitting Bayes_99.
I don't understand, what's the problem?
The problem? Am I misremembering? I was thinking Bayes_99 was a non-
spam indicator?
Ah.. OK, so it's the other way around. Then the problem is, I guess,
Bayes_99 scoring too low. That at least I can fix.
Still, I am surprised this didn't get caught by other rules.
--
Advance and attack! Attack and destroy! Destroy and rejoice!
