"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with > sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for that sender so > that future uses of the AWL for that spammer will push the overall spam > score up?
And also useful[1] for the opposite case of a false positive where a ham mail is marked as spam and you manually learn it as ham. [1] In fact, I think probably more useful.
