RobertH writes: > > as I note in the comments on the blog post -- it seems likely > > that the people having problems are using a bad version of "re2c". > > > > --j. > > > > by bad version, do you mean one that doesnt compile or finish compiling > properly, or one that compiles (completes compilation) yet does "bad" stuff > during the compile (or processing) ??
in my experience, it would fail to compile during the "re2c" step. Note btw that the original reporter indicates that their problem was fixed; they were using an old version of SpamAssassin, with known sa-compile bugs. --j.
