James Wilkinson wrote on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:56:34 +0000: > > well, but how? By auto-learning? In that case you are just multiplying your > > problem. It seems a lot of spam gets miscategorized as ham. Auto-learning > > that spam as ham means enforcing this miscategorization and that's what you > > see as a result. > > When SpamAssassin decides whether or not to learn a message, it does not > take Bayes scores into account. > > So if you have a message that only hits BAYES_00 (with a score of either > -2.3 or -2.6) and another rule with a score of 0.2, that message will > not be learnt (unless you change the limits), because 0.2 is greater > than 0.1 (the limit).
Very well, but doesn't affect anything of what I wrote. ;-) I think you misunderstood my explanation. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
