On 11/11/2008 at 7:58 PM Dave Koontz wrote: >There are many non-profits out there that will hit your limits... I >don't think anyone knows how many there are. 1,000 users is fairly >trivial, and most non profits won't even be able to fill in your forms >second "required" field of how many messages on "Average" they send a day. > >I can tell you that most all small 'private' not for profit schools and >colleges will get hit hard by your new fees. In fact, your new fees are >more than we spend on our email server per year, and as a result will >never happen. > >Given this change in SURBL in policy and pricing, I would strongly >suggest removing their rules from the SA rule base. Otherwise, you will >likely get lots of complaints from users of systems that have embedded >SA installs, or others who do not monitor this list. I can see many >Barracuda users not having a clue why they are now being blocked and >their systems are processing messages slower as a result. > >Sorry Jeff, but this is much too expensive for us and many others I >suspect.
"or processing fewer than 250,000 messages per day" Wouldn't that cover most not for profit organisations? Peter
