[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Swinog has no listing for this url - so why does spamassassin mark this mail?
because it is listed on swinog:
$ host s9y.org.uribl.swinog.ch
s9y.org.uribl.swinog.ch has address 127.0.0.2
As others said, swinog isn't part of the default SA rules. you added it.
and more than that: you gave it a score of 10, which isn't what is a lot
more than what is suggested on
http://antispam.imp.ch/05-uribl.php
Hallo!
As has been already said, avoid posting "spammy" content here. put it on
a web page (pastebin or other).
> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by ks360112.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29E67AC223
> for <spamverzeichnis>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:35:54 +0100 (CET)
if this is a dedicated host, owner/admin should configure a custom rDNS
(it's a one click on the "manager" UI).
> Received: from jayniz.de (jayniz.de [62.93.205.28])
> by ks360112.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:35:24 +0100 (CET)
> Received: from 62.93.205.28 (klabinster [88.198.56.165])
> by jayniz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0AD674716
wow!
- forged helo: client helo-es with server IP.
- ratware: helo is invalid ("naked" IP)
- claimed rdns is invalid. ("klabinster" is not fqdn). I can't believe
postfix on jayniz.de added this rdns for 88.198.56.165...
