On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 23:19 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Yes, there is. Your MUA, Evolution, features pre-formatted paragraphs in > the Composer. But I don't feel like repeating myself today. > True enough. It usually merely annoys me when replying to messages sent some, probably MS, MUA that sends paragraphs as one long line. Its not identifying itself, but it uses a message id of [EMAIL PROTECTED] which should be rather distinctive. I must remember to use it selectively to prevent line wrapping. > > describe MG_CASINO Casino gambling > > body __MG_CAS1 /(csnaio|casino)/i > > header __MG_CAS2 Subject =~ /casino/i > > header __MG_CAS3 From =~ /casino/i > > body __MG_CAS4 /(\$[0-9]+|[0-9]+ *euro|gold|real deal|invite.*play)/i > > meta MG_CASINO ((__MG_CAS1||__MG_CAS2||__MG_CAS3)&&__MG_CAS4) > > score MG_CASINO 2.0 > > Hmm, it might be worth for local rules, to score at least a few of > them on sight with a low score, yet keeping them in the meta. (Yes, > single word rules are generally bad, but scoring a From header that > contains specific words might help catch these.) I'd enforce word > breaks, though. > ...and reduce the meta score to compensate?
Has the Perl regex syntax changed since Perl4? If it has I think I need to get another Perl book before venturing away from the simple subset I'm comfortable with. > This one would have been flagged as spam when using the default > required_score spam threshold of 5.0. > I'm thinking about reducing that back to the default. I initially set it higher while finding out how to use SA. > Also, I notice you're apparently > not using Bayes, which likely could raise the score above your 6.0 > threshold, when trained on these. > Not entirely. Its enabled but I'm only using auto-learn with default thresholds. However its probably not doing much at present because I recently reset it by deleting the bayes database. > On my check the sample also scored 0.8 for SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL. Plus > Pyzor, which is not enabled by default unless you install Pyzor. > Noted. > URIBL_BLACK as well as SURBL JP and OB triggered for me. These might > very well be updated *after* you received that mail, but it won't hurt > to check, if they are working for you at all. > Yes, they are now scoring here too. > Oh, and then I got a custom rule worth 0.5 for any single Relay, direct > client to MX mail. > Nope, I'm not seeing that one. Thanks for your input. Martin
