> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 23:59 +0200, Jonas Eckerman wrote: > > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > >> In my understanding, these are different concepts. In particular, RMX > > >> doesn't hijack the TXT record, which is one of the major sins of SPF. > > > > > Yes, but they both were designed to do the same work. SPF however can do > > > more. TXT was used because nothing else could, at least I think so. > > > > They could have used a prefix "host" to avoid hijacking the main > > TXT record. (So you'd query the TXT record for > > "__spf__.domain.tld" or something like that instead of the TXT > > record for "domain.tld" when checking SPF.
On 28.10.08 07:01, Daniel J McDonald wrote: > Could of, but underscores are not a legal character in domain names. in _host_ names. they are being tested in other DNS names, like SRV -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
