[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Gentlemen, it seems spamassassin used full military justice here:
>
>  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message

0 points, so it's just noting.

>  2.5 MPART_ALT_DIFF         BODY: HTML and text parts are different
> well of course, because

This rule seems like it should not have fired.

>  2.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
> OK, then
>  1.7 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG  HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
> I dunno, maybe they thought they already said I'm text/html.

Perhaps they thought, but the message is malformed.

>  0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI   Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts
> Yes.

Just noted, so doesn't count.

> Gee, all the message did bad was
>
> |Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;
> |     boundary="----=_Part_742221_601951471.1223963124030"
> |X-Mailer: HiNet WebMail
> |
> |------=_Part_742221_601951471.1223963124030
> |Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
> |Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> |
> |<DIV>...
> |------=_Part_742221_601951471.1223963124030--


What it did bad was two things:

  text/html without text/plain (poor form)
  html without a proper html tag (standards violation)

So 2 of the 3 complaints were accurate.

Attachment: pgp6cesXMos0L.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to