On 10/11/2008 12:43 AM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:15:00AM +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
74.714  78.1593   1.1130    0.986   0.78    0.00  URIBL_BLACK
Would you pls post those FP URIs so ppl can judge what your rating is based upon.

(imperfect) command posted for my future reference ...
$ grep URIBL_BLACK ham-net-theo.log | samailoffset | egrep -A1 ' URIBL_BLACK ' 
| grep URIs | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn


    180         *      [URIs: displaymarketplace.com]
not listed

     16         *      [URIs: cmcx4.com]
no site on URI????

      6         *      [URIs: bme1.net]
hits harvested tagged traps addrs.
(lottsa evidence)


      5         *      [URIs: s2d6.com]
not listed


      5         *      [URIs: expatica.com]
not listed

      3         *      [URIs: closeoutcatalogoutlet.com]
parked site

      2         *      [URIs: n-email.com]
Delivra ESP - dirty lists hits traps on a daily basis.
Snowshoeing domains


      2         *      [URIs: lduhtrp.net]
not listed - redirects to CommissionJunction trash - in & out of
blacklists all the time.
ZERO global relevance.

      2         *      [URIs: internetbrands1.com]
not listed - often spamvertized to traps

      1         *      [URIs: mybid.com.au]
was delisted on         2008-09-18 - HOSTED PHISH

      1         *      [URIs: jdoqocy.com]
no listed - last UCE reported on        2008-06-17

      1         *      [URIs: delivra.com]
ESP with dirty practices - tons of complaints.
List appender, the works - hardly worth a CPU cycle
Snowshoeing domains


      1         *      [URIs: bit.ly]
abused URL shortener - no abuse prevention
not worth the cycles

      1         *      [URIs: barackobama.com]

listed in white.uribl.com
hits harvested rcpts on daily basis


Something tells me your stats are either obsolete, biased, borked or
your ham corpus would be quite a few other ppl's mainsleaze spam corpus.

Imo, that 1.1% FP rating seems to have little value in a global context.

thx for the trouble...










Reply via email to