On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:02 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > To be a little more helpful and less snippy -- if you want more detailed
> > answers, and check if it might be a different bug than the one
> > mentioned, telling us about your SA version would be a smart first
> > move...
> 
> I wasn't being snippy.

Oh, I was. :)

> I replied with more information to Daryl's post but I must
> have sent it directly to him instead of the list. I don't have the exact reply
> handy but I am running  SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10)
> The bug does seem to be very simmilar to bug# 4179
> 
> So maybe the bug still exists under different circumstances?

Yup, your follow-up didn't make it to the list. Anyway, now that we know
about your SA version, we're getting somewhere. Still assuming bug 4179
actually is the one Daryl was talking about...

Maybe it merely fixes issues with user *rules*, and the same bug with
user settings slipped by unnoticed.  Daryl, Justin?


William, please search bugzilla for duplicates first. If you're positive
this issue hasn't been reported before, please feel free to file a new
bug, adding as much details as possible.  Thanks.

  guenther


-- 
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to