"RobertH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\
It hits significantly more spam than zen.spamhaus.org
On my primary mx, today I had 94 mails that hit a zen list but not brbl,
591 that hit a zen list and brbl, and 8042 that hit brbl but not zen.
I am checking -lastexternal addresses only.
Looking through the 2400 or so domains that were marked as spam, I
didn't see any obvious false positives. Looking through the 631 domains
that did not have enough points to be classed as spam, I didn't see more
than one or two that shouldn't have been blocked. granted, i did not
look through the emails themselves, just the domain name.
I'm currently scoring it 1.0, and might raise it up to 2.0 in a couple
of days if nobody starts squawking....
--
Daniel J McDonald,
Would someone consider and post the final somewhat agreed upon rule(s) and
scoring that you are using please?
I saw one or two yet they were picked a bit by the list for scoring theory
and syntax.
I think not using last external was one of the reasons the others were not
recommended or used.
Thanks
- rh
I'm using the following (be mindful of any line wrapping - there should be four
lines below)...
header RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl-lastexternal',
'b.barracudacentral.org.', '127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_BRBL Received via relay listed in Barracuda RBL
score RCVD_IN_BRBL 1.0
tflags RCVD_IN_BRBL net
Cheers,
Jeremy
