McDonald, Dan wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:23:45AM -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:14 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 18:18 -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
We're trying it today.
Hmm I signed up for this 1-2 days ago but never got a confirmation e-mail
from them? What is the RBL name?
Here are the rules I'm using:
# URL: http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl/
header __RCVD_IN_BRBL eval:check_rbl('brbl', 'b.barracudacentral.org')
describe __RCVD_IN_BRBL received via a relay in b.barracudacentral.org
header RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY eval:check_rbl_sub('brbl', '127.0.0.2')
tflags RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY net
describe RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY received via a relay rated as poor by
Barracuda
score RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY 1.00
Note that this checks all Received headers, I'm seeing lots of FPs for
dynamic clients sending through ISP hosts etc. Try 'brbl-lastexternal' for
connecting clients only. If you keep on comparing hits, do tell which method
you are using.
Ok, using -lastexternal for about 5 hours
$ grep -P '^Sep 22 1[34567]' /var/log/mail/info | grep -P [^M][SPX]BL | grep -c
-v BRBL
55 # on Zen not on BRBL
$ grep -P '^Sep 22 1[34567]' /var/log/mail/info | grep -v -P [^M][SPX]BL | grep
-c BRBL
352 # on BRBL not on Zen
$ grep -P '^Sep 22 1[34567]' /var/log/mail/info | grep -P [^M][SPX]BL | grep -c
BRBL
122 # on both
Hi Dan,
Can you throw my black list into the mix. I want to see how it scores.
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com = 127.0.0.2 black
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com = 127.0.0.1 white
