Skip Morrow wrote:
On Thu, September 18, 2008 9:33 am, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
(1) train your bayes with it
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at that.
hmmmm...
Content analysis details: (6.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.3 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
1.5 BASE64_LENGTH_79_INF BODY: BASE64_LENGTH_79_INF
0.0 MIME_BASE64_BLANKS RAW: Extra blank lines in base64 encoding
(2) try the sought fraud ruleset that Justin is generating
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_sough
t_fraud.cf
I'm using that too, and again no joy there. It may be time for an
sa-update though.
sa-update and jm sought here. without Bayes, it's missed.
